We’ve all been there, sitting in a meeting where someone’s explanation leaves you more confused than when they started, or reading an email three times and still not understanding what they’re asking for. Communication breakdowns like these happen every day, and they’re frustrating for everyone involved.
The truth is, clear communication isn’t just a “nice to have” skill, it’s absolutely essential. When we communicate clearly, we build better relationships, avoid costly mistakes, and get things done more efficiently. But when clarity’s missing? That’s when misunderstandings pile up, deadlines get missed, and conflicts emerge seemingly out of nowhere.
What Research Tells Us About Effective Communication
Over the years, researchers have developed frameworks that help explain why some communication works while other attempts fall flat. Here are three that I find particularly useful:
The Shannon-Weaver Model (1949): Back in the 1940s, Claude Shannon and Warren Weaver were studying how telephone systems worked, and they came up with a model that’s still relevant today. Their key insight? Messages need to be encoded properly by the sender and decoded accurately by the receiver. But here’s the catch, there’s always “noise” in the system. This could be literal noise (like background chatter), but it could also be unclear language, distractions, or even our own biases getting in the way.
Grice’s Conversational Maxims (1975): Philosopher Paul Grice noticed that good conversations follow certain unspoken rules. He identified four maxims: say enough but not too much (quantity), be truthful (quality), stay on topic (relation), and be clear and organized (manner). When people violate these maxims, like rambling on forever or constantly changing the subject, communication breaks down.
Cognitive Load Theory (1988): Psychologist John Sweller’s research showed us something important: our brains can only handle so much information at once. When we overwhelm people with too many details, their ability to understand and retain information plummets. This is why dumping everything you know about a topic into one email rarely works.
Five Practical Ways to Communicate More Clearly
Based on these theories and my own experience, here are five principles that genuinely make a difference:
1. Keep It Simple This doesn’t mean dumbing things down, it means respecting your audience’s time and mental energy. If you’re writing to colleagues outside your department, avoid insider jargon. If you’re explaining something technical, use everyday language whenever possible. Ask yourself: “Would my message make sense to someone encountering this topic for the first time?”
2. Get to the Point We’re all busy, and nobody has time to wade through unnecessary fluff. Before sending that email or starting that presentation, identify your core message. What’s the one thing you need people to remember? Lead with that. You can always provide supporting details afterward, but don’t bury your main point three paragraphs in.
3. Give Your Message Structure Random thoughts thrown together create confusion. Instead, organize your information with a clear flow: tell people what you’re going to tell them, tell them, then summarize what you told them. Use headings, bullet points, or numbered lists when appropriate, they’re not just cosmetic; they help people follow your thinking.
4. Make It Relevant Think about your audience. What do they already know? What do they care about? What questions might they have? A presentation to executives should look different from one to your technical team, even if you’re discussing the same project. Tailor your message to meet people where they are.
5. Stay Consistent Nothing confuses people faster than changing terminology midway through or switching your tone unexpectedly. If you call something “Project Phoenix” in the first paragraph, don’t start calling it “the new initiative” later. Consistency builds trust and makes your message easier to follow.
The Bottom Line
Clear communication isn’t some innate talent that people either have or don’t, it’s a skill we can all develop. By keeping these principles in mind and being intentional about how we share information, we can reduce misunderstandings and communicate more effectively in every area of our lives.
References
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41-58). Academic Press.
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Global Discipleship Network 